Review of Literature
Children
are read stories at home and at school.
The purpose of these read-alouds plays a more important role in a
child's literacy development than we realize.
These read-aloud experiences allow the children to construct meaning from
the text. Read-alouds
can take place in a whole class, small group or in a one-to-one setting.
The conversations that surround the text before, during and after the
reading play a vital role in the student's comprehension of the story.
Learning to read and reading to learn are important components of
literacy development.
In order for students to learn to read they need to acquire the
strategies needed to become independent readers and learners.
The strategies include being active participants, building schema, text
interaction, and accessing prior knowledge and experiences to bring into the
meaning making process.
The read-aloud experience helps the students to learn these strategies
during their literacy development.
As in the Dennis and Walter article they quoted from Anderson et al. in Becoming
a Nation of Readers that “the
single most important activity for building knowledge required for eventual
success is reading aloud to children.” (p.33)
Learning
to read requires the students to be active participants.
Interactive read-alouds opens the door for the student to respond freely
and openly in a social context (Barrentine, 1996). As students are actively questioning and commenting on the
words of the texts and of their peers they are constructing meaning.
This meaningful dialogue that is transpiring allows deeper and more
thoughtful meanings of the text to emerge.
As students begin to internalize the story and dive deeper into more
critical thinking about the text they are moving closer to the ownership of the
story. The importance of story
ownership follows “the belief of the power of literacy to change our lives and
the lives of children” (Sipe, 2002, p.482).
Although not all students are active learners who question and take
control of conversations, the passive learners still benefit from the read-aloud
experience. They listen to and
think about what their peers have said and they begin processing the information
to make meaning with the text. In
Morrow and Smith's study (1990) Morrow states that “reading stories to
children aids in their literacy development because the children and adults
appear to learn best through active generative learning” (Morrow & Smith,
1990, p.215).
Learning
to read should occur in a social context. The
social interaction between classmates and their teacher plays an important role
in the comprehension of the text. It
is the talk that surrounds the reading that is crucial to literacy development.
“Literacy develops through social interactions between children and
significant others in specific environments” (Morrow & Smith, 1990,
p.215). The child learns to
negotiate text and build schema when they are engaged in dialogue about the
story. It is through the
conversations with their peers that story meanings become clear and more
structured for the students. In a
study conducted by Morrow and Smith (1990) they found out that small group read-alouds
were more beneficial to story comprehension than the one-to-one and whole class
settings. The interactions among
the small group members helped to improve comprehension because the students
were better able to explain the material and they could clarify any
misconceptions that other students might have had. Interactive read aloud is a very social experience but a
rewarding one. It is both positive
and rewarding because it gives many opportunities for all children to
participate and benefit from the interactions and the dialogue with their peers.
(Barrentine, 1996).
An
important part of learning to read is the comprehension aspect. Learning to read is developmental and learning how to
understand a story is developmental also. It
is important that emergent readers develop story schema, to assess prior
knowledge and experience and to make meaning from the text. Emergent readers learn these strategies through the modeling
of them from their teachers and their peers.
The read-aloud experience invites these opportunities for modeling in a
casual, relaxed and social ways.
There
are many ways that teachers can model appropriate comprehension strategies with
read-alouds. One example of
teaching the strategies is Text Talk. Text
Talk is an approach the students use to build meaning through open ended
discussions and questions. (Beck & McKeown, 2001).
Text Talk is a strategy based on the work of Beck and McKeown called
Questioning the Author. “Questioning
the Author focuses on text ideas and encourages students' participation in
building meaning from those ideas as they read the text” (Beck & McKeown,
2001, p.15). Through talking about
what they have read they are building up comprehension and they are enhancing
their language development. As
teachers it is important to keep the conversations focused, to build scaffolding
where it is needed and to monitor the talk that is being done during the read
aloud experience.
Another
example to help guide reading comprehension development during the read-alouds
would be an approach called instructional conversations.
During these conversations the students are expected to actively build
upon their own knowledge and understanding (Goldenberg, 1993).
The instructional conversations approach is divided into two groups of
instruction, instructional and conversational. (Goldenberg, 1993).
In the instructional part teaching is organized around learning. The
conversations that surround this talk are directed and scripted by the teacher.
In the conversational part, the learning revolves around the interactions
and talk with peers and teachers. It
is free flowing and not directed by the teacher.
The talk begins to take on a life of its own.
These types of conversations are not like the structured teaching that
many teachers are use to. Instructional
conversations help promote reading comprehension because it is through this type
of talk that the meaning making process begins to develop and mature.
The teacher provides the theme or the focal point and the students jump
into dialogue with each other.
Another
program that is beneficial to the early and emergent readers is the Directed
Listening Activity (DLTA). This
framework provides the students with a strategy to organize and recall
information from a storybook (Strickland & Morrow, 1989).
This is essential to early and emergent readers because they need
guidelines to help them build story structure and later be able to demonstrate
that knowledge through a retelling of a particular text.
“Through retelling, they demonstrate comprehension of story details and
sequence, adding inferences and interpretations as well” (Strickland &
Morrow, 1989, p.323).
Another strategy used to help promote
reading comprehension is the Directed Reading Activity. (DRA).
The Directed Reading Activity is an organized framework that provides
students with the scaffolding needed to understand an unfamiliar text. (Morrow,
1984) The DRA consists of questions
that the teacher would ask before and after the story was read.
Questions consisted of traditional comprehension questions, story
structure questioning or a combination of both types of questions.
In a study conducted by Morrow (1984) she found out that children scored
higher on a comprehension test when they were provided with the scaffolding they
needed to understand a story. When
the DRA is modeled and practiced by the teacher the students can begin to
internalize this framework and bring it with them when they read an unfamiliar
text. The DRA is another technique
to help students understand a story.
It is important that the students recognize what they bring forth to a conversation is an important piece to the comprehension puzzle. The students must use their prior knowledge and experiences and begin to make connections with their own experiences to the story that is being read. If teachers demonstrate the value of a student's personal experience and prior knowledge to a story character's experiences than the teacher will see that the student understands what is happening in the story. The read-aloud experience is a perfect opportunity to teach reading comprehension strategies. Through the teacher's modeling of thinking aloud and thinking while reading the students will begin to see that good readers think while they are reading (Taberski, 1998). The thinking aloud process will help readers to understand the story better and make predictions about future events, all strategies needed to help promote reading comprehension. Teaching strategies to students is a vital part of learning how to read. The read-aloud experience allows the teacher to model, demonstrate, and to think aloud how to begin the process of making sense of an unknown story.
Repeated
readings of the same book play an integral role of a student's comprehension
of that text. There have been many
studies done to show the positive effects of repeated readings.
Through repeated readings the students understand the text better because
they are able to make more literal and inferential meanings about the story.
(Martinez, 1983). They know what
comes next and begin to gain a sense of ownership of that story.
Comprehension takes time and repeated readings of the same storybook
allow for the time the students need to make meaning (Yadan, 1988).
In Dennis and Walter's 1995 study on repeated read-alouds there was a
significant increase in the scores of first graders on an oral retelling of a
repeated story compared to their scores from a single read.
The differences they found in the retellings were centered on the fact
that the children gave more details, more plot events and had a more complete
story sequence when they were retelling the story from a repeated read aloud.
In this study they discovered that the repeated read aloud benefited all
students regardless of their abilities. The
repeated read aloud is an important component of the comprehension process.
Reading a story over and over again helps the students to make
connections with the text and to bring forth their own personal experiences. It also helps students to listen differently because they
know what to expect in the story. Many
times children pick up ideas and thoughts during the second and third reads that
they did not see in the initial read. In
these types of read alouds the children take on a more active role by starting
the conversations and sharing more comments about the story with the group
(Martinez & Roser, 1985). The
students are able to gain more control over story structure and gain a sense of
ownership of that story. The children's pleas to read it again should not be
ignored because of the important role that repeated readings play in the
comprehension process.
When
children enter a classroom they bring with them a diverse background of literacy
experiences. Some children enter
the classroom with little or no previous exposure to read-alouds or with books.
At that moment they are already falling behind in their literacy
development. Teachers can help
close the already widening gap with read-alouds in the classroom.
Klesius and Griffith (1996) tried to recreate the lap reading experience
of home in a Kindergarten classroom. They
called on volunteers and aides to read with a small group of children every day
during an independent reading block of time.
This newly created situation allowed the students to experience being
active participants in the reading process, to gain knowledge about themselves
and the world around them and most importantly to experience the pleasure of
reading. All of these are important
parts of their literacy development that they were missing because of their
experiences at home. In a study
conducted by Morrow, O'Connor and Smith (1990) the researchers investigated
the effects of a story reading program on literacy development of at-risk
Kindergarten students. They found
out that the storybook reading program developed the skills needed for early
reading readiness. It also helped
to improve the students' comprehension and attempted readings. Most importantly it encouraged more reading to be done at
home, an essential part of getting at risk students on grade level.
Prior to the study many of the participants were never read to at home.
In another study using low income and at risk students, Brown, Cromer and
Weinberg (1986) wanted to find out if the shared book experience was a
successful model of literacy development especially for this particular
population. In their shared book
experience, the teacher or the aide reads the story to the students four times,
they listened to the story on tape and in a small group setting.
Activities of the day were related to the stories that were read.
The researchers analyzed the results of their study and noticed an
increase in the number of low income children
whose scores on a state mandated
assessment test increased. There were more
students above the cut off mark which was designed to target which students
would be labeled at risk. The
shared book experience made an impact on the readiness of these particular
students and it also provided all the students with the necessary tools to help
in their process of learning to read in first grade. The teachers of this study noticed that the students were
more aware of the concepts of prints and were actively involved in the literacy
events that were unfolding in front of them.
The
read-aloud experience is an important part of a child's literacy development
but it is often ignored or rushed in today's pressure packed curriculum.
It is an easy part of the curriculum to implement because all that an
adult really needs is quality books to read to a child and time.
The problem of time and trying to fit everything into the day was seen in
a study done by Copenhaver (2001). In
her study she observed a master teacher who was torn between the read aloud
experience that she believed in and the district's skills based reading
program. The teacher tried to fit
in the read alouds when some free time opened up in her day.
Copenhaver observed that discussions around the text were based on
straight forward comprehension questions and talk that needed to stay on topic.
Many of the teacher's comments were for behavior issues and there were
some validated comments for the students and many invalidated responses.
When Copenhaver and the teacher changed the way she did the read-alouds,
back to the way she did them before Copenhaver noticed changes in the students
as well. The behavior issues
stopped and the conversations and interchange between the students and the
teacher were rich and similar to the kinds of literature conversations that the
teacher had before. The time constraints that were put on the read alouds really
affected the whole experience. When
the time constraints were removed the read-alouds were rich, and the students
talked, debated and participated in the reading experience.
A rushed read aloud had an affect on all the children especially the
borderline children who are at risk. To
make the read-alouds truly beneficial we need to give the time it deserves.
In another study that demonstrated the power of time in the read aloud
experience was a study done by Feitelson, Kita & Goldstein (1986).
In their study they wanted to find out what the effects of reading aloud
to first graders would be on their comprehension and use of language.
Their study took place in Israel and the teachers were asked to read 20
minutes a day with their class. The
first graders went to school for half day sessions six days a week.
The researchers found that the students that were in the experimental
group, the group read to for 20 minutes a day, scored significantly higher on
various decoding, comprehension and active use of language tests than the
control group. They also
outperformed the control group in a running record of the student's oral
reading of an unknown passage. The
researchers also discovered that the children were excited about reading and
they were so motivated from this experience that the students encouraged their
parents to buy this series story and to read it by themselves. The researchers did note that one of the teachers was dropped
from this study because she was not reading to her students for the assigned
times. She thought it was too
difficult to find the time to read aloud to her students because there was too
much to do in the first grade curriculum. That
is what is so striking in this study was that the teacher gave up an essential
part of the student's literacy development to work on worksheets and drills.
If the teacher realized the benefits from reading aloud she probably
would have made the time. Reading
aloud is not just reading words from a story to children to fill in some time.
Reading aloud is an experience that children need to make meaning with the text,
to interact with it and to talk about it.
The
read aloud experience is an essential part of a child's literacy development.
In learning to read the students need to be active participants, have
social interactions and need to learn the strategies needed for comprehension
and the read aloud experience guides in this process.
In the interactive read-alouds the children are active in the meaning
making process, discussing, debating and thinking about the responses that they
heard. Learning to read is a very
social process. The read-alouds
encourages talk through small group, large group and even one-to-one situations.
It is the talk that surrounds the text that helps students to understand
the story. During the read-alouds
the teacher is able to model, scaffold, to think aloud and to make connections
that will help the student to learn to comprehend unfamiliar texts
independently. Read-alouds and the
shared book experiences give the tools necessary to help at risk students to be
on target. This type of learning
benefits all types of diverse learners. The
read-aloud experience plays an important role in a child's literacy
development and it should not be taken for granted the impact that it makes.
The difference of reading to a child 20 minutes a day can make will last
a lifetime.
Click here to go back to the literature review page
Click here to go back to the design of the research
| Home | Table of Contents | Researcher's Background | Literature Review | Field Research |
| Design | Findings | Conclusions | Additional Links | Lesson Plans and Assessments |