|
|
|
LEARNING AND THE LEARNER |
|
CURRICULUM |
|
TEACHER ROLES |
|
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities that extend students own particular
interests and abilities serve to broaden their knowledge base. (Goodman
2000, Harste, Burke & Woodward 2000; Ruddell and Unreau 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Every reader constructs meaning through
transactions with text by hypothesizing or predicting. A reader then confirms and/or
disconfirms preexisting ideas and beliefs.
Group discussions, partner-sharing, and collaborative assignments
should be natural extensions of “silent reading” assignments. (Goodman
2000; Paris, Lipson & Wixson 2000; Rosenblatt 2000;Ruddell and Unrau
2000) |
|
|
|
|
Social interaction and collaboration are
critical components of an authentic and effective literacy program. An environment that motivates and
fosters students' interest and development in all areas of reading and writing
is paramount to literacy acquisition. (Brown, Palincsar & Armbruster
2000; Goodman 2000; Harste, Burke & Woodward 2000; Ruddell and Unreau
2000) |
|
|
|
|
Many students who have difficulty working
independently “shine” during classroom discussions. (Halliday 1994; Paris,
Lipson & Wixson 2000; Ruddell and Unreau 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Class discussions are perfect platforms for
student/teachers to share their schema-their own organized knowledge of the
world regarding the topic at hand.
Additionally this provides the opportunity for students/teachers to
appreciate one another's unique insights and continue to formulate new
schemata. (Anderson 2000, Bransford 2000; Ruddell and Unrau 2000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology is an integral part of the literacy
curriculum. Students find computer
usage highly motivating – capitalize on it! Word processing programs support writing acquisition
skills. Access to the Internet
allows children to collaborate and communicate with audiences that extend
beyond their classroom. (Daiute 1985; Flood and Lapp 1994; Harste 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Direct instruction, whether in the area of
decoding, comprehension, spelling or writing provides students with
numerous strategies from which to choose when approaching various
tasks. Skills instruction that is
embedded within the curriculum help students “make the connection” between
theory and practice. (Bransford 2000; Brown, Palincsar & Armbruster
2000; Paris, Lipson & Wixson 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Integrated curriculum encompasses all subject
areas. Teachers from each
discipline collaborate to develop common topics and themes. Emphasis on continual development of
language and literacy skills across the curriculum is a vital component of
this model. (Goodman 2000; Rosenblatt 2000; Ruddell and Unreau 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Inquiry based curriculum: students are active
learners. Naturally inquisitive,
children are eager to learn, explore, examine, and formulate individual or
joint questions in an attempt to confirm, clarify or expand their existing
knowledge bases. (Harste, Burke & Woodward 2000; Hayes 1994; Moll 2000;
Ruddell and Unreau 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Curriculum with a component that capitalizes on
the multitude of cognitive resources that families and community have to
offer can be extremely educational and rewarding for all involved. (Dyson
1994; Moll 2000; Ruddell and Ruddell 2000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form a parent/teacher partnership. Encourage parent participation in
student literacy development.
Educate parents how to work with their child. |
|
(Dyson, 1994; Ruddell and Ruddell 2000;
Schickendanz 1994) |
|
|
|
|
Encourage a supportive community of learners
where students feel safe to “go out on a limb” and share their opinions in
a safe and nurturing environment.
(Brown, Palincsar & Amrbruster 2000; Rosenblatt 2000; Yopp and
Singer 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Appreciate and provide for the uniqueness of
each student. Typical classrooms
are comprised of students with various backgrounds in language, skill
acquisition, learning styles and rates of learning. (Anderson 2000;
Bransford 2000; Kintch 2000; Ruddell 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Read, read, read. Expose, model and guide students through authentic activities
that facilitate opportunities to develop and improve comprehension via
authentic reading experiences. (Johnson 1994; Paris, Lipson & Wixson
2000, Rosenblatt 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Stimulate learning by demonstrating, inviting,
discussing, affirming, facilitating, collaborating. (Goodman 2000; Paris,
Lipson & Wixson 2000; Ruddell and Ruddell 2000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment methods that involve multiple
measures over time will result in more accurate and reliable information
than “one-shot' assessments.
(Applebee 1994; Goodman 2000; Harste 2000; Rosenblatt 2000) |
|
|
|
|
Successful acquisition and application of
literacy skills and strategies are evidenced when these skills are
transferred from one task to another—transmediation. (Goodman 2000; Halliday 2000; Harste
2000) |
|
|
|
|
Daily oral and written activities provide
authentic evidence of students' actual work in the classroom that results
from learning. Comparison of the
level or quality of students work over time will help to determine
students' progress as well as give insights as to which instructional
methods to maintain or change. (Flood and Lapp 1994; Johnson 1994; Ruddell
2000) |
|
|
|
|
Scheduled or impromptu conferences between a
teacher and student, where each share an equally important role, provide
the opportunity for informal assessment of a student's literacy
status. (Paris, Lipson & Wixson
2000; Rosenblatt 2000; Ruddell and Unrau 2000) |
|
|
|
Back to Home |
|
|
|