Literacy Research

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From Pits to Passion

Does implementing transactional strategies instruction improve reading comprehension and enable a reader to move from an acclimated reader to a proficient reader?

The development of literacy is a complex process. To become a reader and writer an individual must be able to coordinate a variety of skills. The formal reading instruction usually begins with phonemic awareness and the understanding that words are made up of individual sounds and have meaning. Without this foundation, the reading process would be extremely challenging for individuals. With a structured skilled-based curriculum, most readers are able to make progress and achieve the skills to be needed to begin to interact with written material.  Through direct teaching and modeling,as well as personal reading and writing experiences, students can slowly build a repertoire of skills and comprehension strategies.

Reading comprehension requires readers to transact with the text to construct meaning. Comprehension strategies involve an awareness of interacting with the written material and an ability to construct meaning. These reading comprehension strategies must be modeled, learned, repeated and reinforced for a reader to evolve from an acclimated reader to a proficient reader. Good readers are able to utilize more skills and strategies than poor readers, so learning to read requires the interrelationship of awareness, motivation and instructional methods. The skill, will, and thrill of a reader helps the learner to plan, evaluate and develop an interest in reading to transform into a self-directed learner (Alexander & Jetton, 2000). In other words, a reader must possess the capability to decode written language, have motivation to read text and become engaged in reading to transform into a proficient reader.

When thinking about the complexity of the literacy process as well as the development of reading, some children have the ability to understand grapheme-phonemic relationships and the structure of language, but are unable to negotiate and construct meaning through text. This research focuses on reading comprehension strategies to help acclimated readers become proficient.

This summary will describe the transactional strategies instruction (TSI) and the impact it makes on reading comprehension. Transactional strategies instruction approach can be best described as multi-faceted, balanced or student-centered. The core of transactional strategies instruction is the theory that readers must be able to transact with text to gain meaning (Goodman, 1994, Rosenblatt, 1994). With transactional strategies instruction primary to secondary students are able to access meaningful content material. Therefore, TSI enables children to think about comprehension strategies, utilize comprehension strategies proficiently and engage in reading to construct meaning from a variety of genres.

            Historically, researchers have continually questioned which methodology for reading instruction is best (Reading Instruction, 1997). The shifts in literacy indicate researchers, educators and parents are looking for an alternate pedagogy for reading and writing (Brown & Coy-Ogan, 1993). The phonetic-based reading programs stress decoding skills, and the whole language philosophy emphasizes comprehension, but transactional strategies instruction (TSI) combines both methods to help students improve their word attack skills and reading comprehension. Direct modeling and direct instruction of decoding skills and comprehension strategies are combined as the ideal methodology for transactional strategies. Decoding skills are as vital as comprehension strategies for success in literacy (Yopp & Singer, 1994). The TSI supports decoding skills by allowing a student to select one or more of the following ways:

·                     Sound out the word

·                     Look for context clues

·                     Reread

·                     Skip the word (not every word is needed for understanding)

With a variety of word attack strategies, a learner will become engaged in reading and will attempt more challenging text. This path will lead a child to become an interactive reader.

Transactional strategies instruction stresses that a reader needs to have a selection of strategies to engage in text to comprehend a variety of genres (Goodman, 1994). Students are taught an assortment of strategies to assist them in deriving meaning from text, and this repertoire of strategies can be taught in different instructional settings.  Some TSI comprehension strategies that can be taught are:

·                     Make predictions

·                     Relate text to background knowledge

·                     Ask questions

·                     Seek clarification (i.e. reread, picture clues)

·                     Visualize meaning

·                     Summarize

Transactional strategies instruction is a flexible approach to teach reading comprehension (Pressley & Wharton-McDonald, 1995). Students are taught a variety of strategies, and how to efficiently adapt learned strategies to interact with text to construct meaning. It is the flexibility that allows the instruction of transactional strategies to focus on individuals’ learning styles and change as the learners’ progress. TSI parallels with the student-centered literature model (Baines & Farrell, in press), and Rosenblatt has shown support for the student-centered literature model. She developed one of the first theoretical foundations to be aligned with student-centered instruction. The student-centered literature model and transactional strategies instruction can be individualized as well as adapted to enhance literacy development.

Reading should not be treated as a separate skill or activity, but centered on human beings who are thinking, reading and writing, and continuously transacting with their environment (Rosenblatt, 1994). The transactional theory states that the process of reading involves the mind and the emotions of the reader. The type of attention on what is being read determines the reading continuum. The efferent stance is used to focus on ideas or factual information to be applied after the reading. The aesthetic stance is centered on the feelings that occur during reading and engages experiences of the reader to construct meaning (Rosenblatt, 1994). Reader’s dialogue constructs meaning through interaction with text, and is comparable with the philosophy of transactional theory (Holloway, 1999). The transactional strategies instruction is an active approach to learning to read and write, when knowledge is transferred to build understanding. TSI enables readers to transfer their learned skills and strategies to a variety of genres to gain understanding and allows learners to become proficient readers.

Studies involving elementary to secondary students supported TSI as being beneficial in improving reading comprehension (Pressley, Brown, Van Meter, Schuder, 1995). Researchers demonstrate that students with disabilities, at–risk students, and bilingual students can improve comprehension strategies and decoding skills when actively involved with text. Transactional strategies instruction is flexible, leads to the development of a variety of comprehension strategies, and promotes the interaction with the text for primary and secondary students. Through flexibility and individualized instruction, students can be taught in  their own style to promote comprehension (Rodulfo, 1999).

The U. S. National Reading Panel reported four qualitative studies indicating students involved in a high level of engagement had a positive effect on comprehension. In a 1992 study, 80% of TSI students demonstrated gains on reading comprehension subtests (Comprehension, 1992). Transactional strategies instruction develops decoding skills as well as comprehension strategies substantiated by standardized tests (Pressley, El-Dinary, Gaskins, Schuder, Bergman, Almaso, Brown, 1992).

Although research indicated transactional strategies instruction approach improved reading comprehension, some researchers scrutinized the methodology. Some questions from the readings were: Would TSI would frustrate students? Would skipping words may be problematic? Would the interest in reading may be lost? and Would the fun could be taken out of reading? (Ferro-Almeida, 1993). The TSI takes approximately three years of continuous training to become an expert teacher. Educators must examine their current pedagogy and evaluate the transactional strategies approach before making the decision of integrating another literacy approach.

Does implementing transactional strategies instruction improve reading comprehension and enable a reader to move from an acclimated reader to a proficient reader?

            The transactional strategies instruction is an active approach to reading and writing, in which knowledge is transferred to construct meaning. Students are learning multiple strategies and skills, developing an awareness of the reading process and acquiring more information from text while using meaningful content material. Therefore, implications from the studies indicate transactional strategies instruction provides students with an array of strategies, increased readers’ comprehension, and developed independent readers (Pressley, et al., 1995).

 

Sharon R. Dulin

Abstract

Literacy: A Balanced Approach

Literacy Research

Proposal

Research Findings

Conclusion

References

Favorite Links

Glossary

Children’s Books

 

Home Page